Monday 16 November 2009

Shipping off undesirables

Britain has a long history of removing problems in very direct fashion, specifically social problems.

We are all familiar with Australia's history as a prison for Britain, mentioned in Great Expectations and innumerable history books. Americans are possibly familiar with the state of Georgia's history as an early dumping ground for debtors and criminals.

However, criminals were not the only targets of such forceful movement. The poor were also forcibly moved. The tradition of relocation continued in the 20th century with council estates. The poor are moved from some slum in an urban area to a "nicer" council estate just outside of town, which then quickly becomes another slum only with more greenspace.

Social mores were also grounds for physical relocation. It's not difficult for an American to imagine that some of the religious groups that ended up founding the US were forced onto ships at gunpoint instead of leaving of their own volition. Pregnancy among single women was also a cause for social extradition, sending women to convents when they were fashionable, and sent away to prison-like institutions as in the movie the Magdalene Sisters, which takes place in Ireland.

But I had never heard of this.

Between the early 19th century and 1967, as many as 150,000 children were taken away from their families and sent to the colonies (such as Australia). While there, they found conditions ranging from adoption with families, to languishing in orphanages, to abuse, and slave labour. The Scotsman reports that Gordon Brown is going to apologise for this travesty.

Children were told stories of "The Cruelty Man" growing up, which was in actuality the ISPCC (Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children) or NSPCC (National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children). Such a man would take you away from your family if you were bad.

The one theme in all of these variations of a method is that not once do they begin to consider the underlying causes of criminality, or if they happen to get far enough, poverty. The poor are merely cattle to be herded in one direction or another, and indeed need to be herded, cajoled, and forced.

Is the US any better with its enormous prison population? Is it any better with its soup kitchens? Is it any better for town mayors to bid for corporations and bribe them to provide jobs for the local populace?

Thursday 12 November 2009

What Does Chocolate Mean To You?



All of the pictures on this were cut from a "Hotel Chocolat" corporate gift catalogue that arrived in the post at work. There were three other pictures of people in the catalogue: one of a child eating an advent calendar, and two featuring Africans to show that they're responsibly helping with fairtrade or whatever.

What is it about Chocolate that necessitates a sexy women in lingerie?

Friday 6 November 2009

Underwear and Hipsters

Two things that are deficient in the UK: underwear and hipsters.

Ok, so there is lots of underwear in the UK, I really mean SEXY underwear. Lingerie. Corsets, bustiers, basques, babydolls. Thongs.

I'm getting married next week. I bought my dress a couple weeks ago, and now that some lovely Polish seamstresses altered it by bringing up the hem and fitting it about the hips, I needed something to go underneath it. Underwear. I had in mind a nice basque in white or ivory, with suspender straps for stockings, strapless top and matching panties. Is that too hard?

But no. We spent THREE DAYS -- FULL AFTERNOONS!!! -- shopping in Edinburgh.

Day 1 We went to EVERY shop on Princes Street, including Ann Summers and La Senza, and found one single basque that fit the requirements at Debenhams. Lots of black, red, purple, any colour you could want, very little available in white or ivory.

Day 2 we went to an enormous "retail park" (that's "shopping mall with retail box stores nearby" for you Americans) in Livingston, and found exactly 0 appropriate basques. (I did, however, find some nice shoes at New Look.)

Day 3 we decided to go to "specialty" shops: a sex shop, goth shops, and pricy lingerie shops. In the end, I lost all motivation to walk any further, and went into Debenhams and bought the same basque I saw two days earlier.

It appears that women prefer to wear horrible "slimming" foundation garments instead of actual lingerie. Or, even worse, some horrible swimsuit-like contraption that would involve snaps everytime I pee. And they always come in "nude". Yeah, that's attractive.

And lingerie sections are always in the back of shops! Why is that? Women should be proud of their undergarments! Have no shame in purchasing panties!

Part Two: Hipsters.

I hate hippies. I'm not too sure about hipsters. Hipsters in the US, well, they come with a "look", don't they? There's a "hipster look", right? We don't deny that hipsters proliferate in the US. But do they exist in the UK? I don't think they necessarily exist in the same incarnation in the UK.

Stereotyped American hipster:


UK Hipster?